Getting Action: Citizens to Governments – Show me the Money!

One of the most fundamental things that governments do, in any country in the world, is take money from citizens through the tax system and then spend it through public budgets.  In between that two-step of raise and spend lie some of the most important choices a nation can make: Do we invest in schools or armies?  How do we address the needs of the poorest?  What kind of infrastructure do we want for the future?  And there are also massive opportunities for corruption as officials confuse public money for their own.

Citizen oversight and advocacy of public budgets has been an important part of the Democracy Center’s work since our establishment 20 years ago.  We founded a progressive analysis organization on budget issues in California, the California Budget Project.  We have also worked closely for more than a decade, across the world, with the International Budget Partnership, a global leader in open and participatory budgeting.  You can read more about the Democracy Center’s work on budget issues here.

We are honored to publish this article below by a friend who has been an essential patron and champion of citizen budget work for decades, Michael Lipsky.  As a program officer at the Ford Foundation in the 1990s Michael seeded not only our first work in California, but other projects across the U.S. and across continents.  In this article, originally published by the Huffington Post, Michael looks at the key role that citizen budget activism plays today in the twin fights against poverty and public corruption.  We know you will find it a valuable read.

Jim Shultz

The Democracy Center

 

 

 

Improving Governance Through Budget Transparency

by Michael Lipsky

A secondary result of the fiscal crises now spooling out in the United States and Europe will be greater scrutiny of the efficacy of public expenditures. Nowhere is this likely to have greater impact than in foreign aid and development assistance, as countries demand greater accountability for each dollar or euro spent. At the same time, citizens in many countries receiving assistance are also pressuring their governments for accountability.

Critical to both of these developments is the focus on public budgets. Whatever elected leaders say, when the last votes are cast and counted the critical question is how governments actually manage their funds to address problems of poverty, provide essential services such as education and health care, and make public investments to secure their future. The flip side of the question is how and in whose interest countries raise funds to fulfill their commitments. Do they use revenues raised from oil, gas, mining and other natural resource extractions for high national priorities? Or are these funds siphoned off for private enrichment? Do they make prudent use of development assistance from abroad?

Historically the purview of accountants and numbers-crunchers, public officials in the past showed little interest in making budgets more accessible. Nonetheless, citizen groups around the world have increasingly demanded access to budget information.

In a report issued on January 5, the U.K. House of Commons’ International Development Select Committee called for making aid to conflict ridden countries dependent on improved governance. The report highlighted the need to tie increased British aid to real commitments from recipients to greater transparency and accountability.

This is just the latest in a wave of government-led initiatives and people-led activism that is shifting the discussion about the openness and accountability of decisions that determine a country’s social and economic trajectory. The Arab Spring, the Occupy protests, and calls like that in the House of Commons to use foreign aid to increase the openness of other governments all point to a seismic shift in the democracy and governance paradigm.

The commitments and aspirations of many of these groups were on display in November when representatives of 58 countries came together in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania to affirm the importance of opening budgets to public scrutiny. Their Declaration on Budget Transparency, Accountability and Participation holds that “participation in the decisions related to public budgets is a fundamental right… of all citizens.” The Dar Declaration calls on all governments to recognize the rights of citizens to know their governments’ spending and revenue-raising policies, and to have regular opportunities to comment on the priorities reflected in them.

But the Dar Declaration is not so much the start of a movement as a milestone. In the last 15 or 20 years, in country after country civil society groups have been organizing to hold their governments to account.

In India, the MKSS uses local knowledge and government budget commitments to take advantage of the country’s 2005 Right to Information law. The organization’s “social audit” enables villagers to verify official claims and hold government to account. Official budget reports may indicate that a school or a road was built, but local residents may have information, literally “before their eyes,” that such projects were never undertaken.

Similarly, the Uganda Debt Network has trained local monitors to insure that inputs in construction and other projects, as promised in budget documents, are actually delivered.

In over 40 U.S. states, groups like the California Budget Project and the Center for Public Policy Priorities in Texas regularly scrutinize budget and tax policies for their impact on low- and moderate-income people.

Twenty years ago hardly any organizations focused on budget transparency as a key to improving democratic accountability and improving outcomes for poor. Now, over 200 groups in at least 119 countries engage in such work, according to the International Budget Partnership, a global research and advocacy organization that collaborates with budget groups around the world.

The interest of civic organizations in public budgeting at national and subnational levels has been matched in recent years by “top down” efforts of international organizations and foundations. Every two years, the IBP’s Open Budget Index (OBI) evaluates countries’ budget processes by engaging independent local researchers to assess whether their country makes timely and useful budget information available to the public and provides opportunities for participation. Over the three rounds of the OBI, a dozen or so countries have made real strides toward greater openness — perhaps because their leaders now know that their budget practices are being scrutinized by leaders in other countries.

What about funds that don’t always show up in budgets — like those from natural resources? Revenue Watch, an international organization started in 2002 as a project of the Open Society Institute, seeks good governance by working with industry and civil society groups in countries rich in oil, gas and mineral reserves to ensure that funds from these resources are monitored and used productively.

For civic organizations and governments seeking to reform other governments, it seems that fiscal transparency’s time has come. The open budget movement and the energy behind it promise to shift, if ever so slightly at first, the grounds on which the nations interact with their citizens and their civic organizations, and with each other.

 

Michael Lipsky, a former professor of political science at M.I.T., is a distinguished senior fellow at Demos, the American think tank based in New York.

 

We look forward to hearing your thoughts on this piece in our comments section below. Our comments policy.

This article was posted in Advocacy, Getting Action. Bookmark this article.

7 Responses to Getting Action: Citizens to Governments – Show me the Money!

  1. Prince says:

    Resources like the one you mntoiened here will be very useful to me! I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.

    • Racha says:

      ignorancia tuya cholo peruano chile con bviloia o sin ella queria lima desde siempre entonces si la guertra era con nosotros por q no entraron a la paz aa por q decenbarcaron mas de 11 chilenos en arica si la guerra era con bviloia ya vasta de mentiras digas loq digas jamas nadie entro hasta la paz encambio hasta nosotros entramos hasta lima y matamos a tu presidente BATALLA DE INGAVY 1842 lee peruano igmorante quien sera los cobardes q aprobecharon y saquearon su propio pais peruano!!! [..YouTube..]

      • Rasiel says:

        Sir,Your government has given an amaznig budget !! Thanks to you and your government !!As a part of media nexus…Your budget has been heavily criticized in the media…Read todays Times of india (english)…COngrats again and move forward !!Nede Munde Nede Munde !! Nuggi Nede Munde !!

  2. What’s up, just wanted to tell you, I enjoyed this article. It was inspiring. Keep on posting!

  3. acha says:

    It’s a valuable resource for the civil society organizations

  4. Raro says:

    What else do you expect from the half eookcd Umnoputra minister ! He is just showing to the world that is the kind of minister of law we have. Therefore one can safely assume that all the laws in the country are like including those looking and ad…

  5. Ari says:

    In a small country like Finland, politicians and big business agree on everything.

    In Finland the editor of Suomen Kuvalehti magazine Martti Backman lost his job in 1995, because his magazine revealed the fusion of two powerful banks (KOP and SYP) prematurely, before the banks wanted it to happen.

    I am from Finland. I have read many things from internet sites only, of which TV and newspapers don’t tell. Actually censorship in the mainstream media makes my country a plutocracy (not democracy), ruled by the political and economic elite.

    http://foundationfordemocraticadvancement.blogspot.com/2012/03/reasons-behind-censorship-of-finnish.html

    http://syys.weebly.com/puppets-of-sweden.html