Monday, May 04, 2009

Notes on the Craft of Writing

Dear Readers:

All life is not politics.

I find myself, too often, trapped by inertia and expectations into writing about whatever new political development crosses the screen here. And I am trying to get away from that. So today, if you want to wade once more into Bolivian politics, look elsewhere. If you want to read the story of how a MAS founder is accusing Evo Morales of heading a government of thieves,
read here. If you want to read about the weekend meeting between Morales and former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, go here. If you want the latest AP report on the "were they assassins or were they assassinated" story, here you go.

As for me, I took a week off recently to head off to a secret spot in Bolivia where I go to from time to time to practice writing of a different sort, my half-crazed effort to write a novel. In the midst of that week immersed in a story that was born in my head and seeks to make its way onto a printed page, I took a moment to write a Blog post reflecting on the craft of writing. Here it is for you to either hate, enjoy, or skip altogether, as you like.


Jim Shultz

Notes on the Craft of Writing

I'm staring at the keyboard of a Dell laptop, waiting for my fingers to invent something. I am sitting in a hotel room carved out of a building that was already old a century ago, a former "mercantile house" (whatever that is) built in the 1800s. The ceiling is probably twenty feet tall. The wallpaper is gray and probably older than I am (I am old). It has tiny white flowers on it. The floor is made of painted red brick. The double bed sags in the middle, giving one an experience roughly akin to sleeping in a bowl. The shower is luke warm. Parrots occupy the overgrown courtyard. I have a small balcony that overlooks the street below. A woman has a small store there. Her apples are covered with a plastic sheet because it has rained all day. Mud coats the streets. Under the mud are stones cut in this shape ( I ) that fit together.

I pay $5 a night to stay here, cold shower but not breakfast included. That costs extra. I am not going to tell you where I am. If you guess right I'll deny it. I don't want you to come here. This is where I come to live out the lunacy of trying to write a novel. If you're a lunatic try it. If not, then don't.

Nonfiction, I know how to write. I have a process. It works. I teach it to other people. It works like this:

1. Gather all the information you'll need to write what you are going to write.

2. Organize the information in some way that seems coherent and understandable.

3. Write it a piece at a time.

4. When you are done with the writing, edit it. Edit the #$%& out of it. You've written too much.

5. When you are doing any one of the above don't try to do any of the others. It won't work. Do only one of them at a time and in that order.


This is my process. It has served me well through three full-length books, a half dozen major reports, and more short articles than I could possibly remember. There are other tips too, like having your audience in your head, but that's more detail than I want to get into here. That's not my point.

My point is this. Writing fiction is a whole other deal, a whole other deal together.

For that you need to sit in a $5 a night hotel room with no Internet or cell phone service. Then you need to stare at the keyboard of a Dell laptop (other brands work as well) and at your fingers and will them into creating something out of nothing. Try it. If you are a lunatic. I think that I mentioned that earlier.

Here's another fiction tip. Pick your reading material carefully. I brought one book to read when I am not writing. It is a book by Isabel Allende, one of her better ones. That might have been a mistake. It might be better not to bring a great book, or even a good book. It might be better to bring a crappy book. If you bring a great book then every five seconds you will say to yourself, "What am I doing? I am a lunatic. I can’t do this. I can't even come a little close to doing this. My writing sucks." If you bring a crappy book then the whole time maybe you'll say, "Hey, I can do this. I can do even better than this." Crappy books are easy to find. I think Amazon has a whole subsection dedicated to them. But I am not sure about that last part, the part about Amazon. It just seems logical.

Did I mention that it has been raining all day?

So here's the deal with writing fiction. Don't get in the way. Don't map it out. Invent some characters that you can really love, some for their goodness, some for their badness and especially ones trying to sort the difference in between. Then put them in some situations that seem interesting and see what they do. If they're good characters and if you love them they'll sort it all out without much help from you, the writer. They will either be noble or ghastly, stupid or smart, flamingly inspirational or deadly boring based on their own free will. You are the writer. You are blameless.

Your job is to bring the laptop, put your fingers on the keys and get the hell out of the way. And occasionally you should leave them alone for a while and get some coffee, maybe read a book (a crappy one, don't forget). Unless your hard disk crashes or someone breaks that little black padlock on your door, neither of which is likely, your characters will still be there when you get back. The really good ones will have jumped off the screen and typed something up for you while you were gone. Mine aren’t that good. I bet Isabel Allende's characters type for her. They seem like they might.

Okay, I cheated. Before I left to come here I laid down 15 Bolivianos for a bootlegged copy (don't tell anyone that part please) of a movie on DVD. It was called "The Day the Earth Stood Still". I watched it one night when I couldn't get my characters to do anything interesting. It's a remake of a movie from the 1950s that I liked, a science fiction classic about a well-dressed man from space who has a big robot with him. After he lands on the Washington Mall soldiers get nervous and shoot the man. The robot gets ticked off and shuts off all the electricity in the world, just to show off I think.

In the new version Keenau Reeves is the well-dressed man from space. He seems a little stiff. Could have been the long flight, or the acting, I'm not sure which. In this new version he lands in Central Park in New York instead of Washington. Maybe this was a statment about where aliens think the power is, or maybe it just looked cooler. Now the people from other planets are ticked off at us about global warming. Before they were ticked about the the Cold War. Aliens get ticked off by different things now than in the 1950s.

That's all I want to say about the movie. You might buy a bootlegged copy too and I don’t want to ruin it for you.

But I'm glad I watched it. Because it inspired me to get back to writing my novel. I thought, "Hey, I can write at least as good as this." Lots of movies are badly written. So if you want to get your confidence back up about writing fiction, watch a movie, especially a remake. It will help.

Okay, I have one last point that I want to make here. If you have read through this entire post and are feeling now that you have wasted ten minutes of your life that you will never get back, well I have no sympathy for you. You should have known what you were getting into back around, "I'm staring at the keyboard of a Dell laptop, waiting for my fingers to invent something."

When I finish my novel it will probably be on the New York Times bestsellers list for 57 weeks. Isabel Allende will probably give me a blurb for the back cover. It will read: "Better than the remake of 'The Day the Earth Stood Still".

You see, once you start writing fiction, you can invent anything. That's the beauty of it.

26 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting, Jim. The first paragraph sounded dark and dreary as if right out of "Blade Runner," you (DVD) pirate, you. You sure you aren't in one of those seedy motels near the "Cementerio Jardin?"

I liked your steps to write nonfiction in a concise and organized way, something that is sorely missing from many comments in this blog. Wait, what am I talking about? Most of the comments are fiction, silly me! It wouldn't hurt for them to be edited for grammatical and humanitarian purposes, though.

Happy fiction writing!

;-)

The Croats are Morales' Jews
Beni is Morales' Katrina

2:51 PM  
Blogger Allie said...

I think that Jim hit the nail on the head. I guess I always thought that writing fiction would be a heck of a lot easier than writing non-fiction. Mainly because, to paraphrase Dave Barry, you can just make stuff up!

I have learned that fiction writing is extremely difficult, and not to be underestimated. I think this is the case because we can construct these wonderfully intricate stories in our heads, but when it comes to putting them on paper, the words sometimes fall short. That, and you didn't pay money to get the formula (you know, the ones that make those romance [errr, not that I read them] and mystery novels all seem so similar).

Good luck writing, Jim.

3:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

C'mon Jim, we have Morales nationalizing anything that moves. We have that dead idiot Flores' case unfolding, we have the witness who implicates Hugo Acha and a fellow NGO in Bolivia (Human Rights Foundation) behind a plan to destabilize the country, we still don't know who was financing them *cough* Marinkovic & the Toborochi *cough* and you're writing about writing?

Am i missing something here, c'mon Jim, step it up.

6:22 PM  
Anonymous Óscar Arias said...

“ALGO HICIMOS MAL”
Presidente de la República

Palabras del presidente Óscar Arias en la Cumbre de las Américas

Trinidad y Tobago

18 de abril del 2009

Tengo la impresión de que cada vez que los países caribeños y latinoamericanos se reúnen con el presidente de los Estados Unidos de América, es para pedirle cosas o para reclamarle cosas. Casi siempre, es para culpar a Estados Unidos de nuestros males pasados, presentes y futuros. No creo que eso sea del todo justo.

No podemos olvidar que América Latina tuvo universidades antes de que Estados Unidos creara Harvard y William & Mary, que son las primeras universidades de ese país. No podemos olvidar que en este continente, como en el mundo entero, por lo menos hasta 1750 todos los americanos eran más o menos iguales: todos eran pobres.

Cuando aparece la Revolución Industrial en Inglaterra, otros países se montan en ese vagón: Alemania, Francia, Estados Unidos, Canadá, Australia, Nueva Zelanda… y así la Revolución Industrial pasó por América Latina como un cometa, y no nos dimos cuenta. Ciertamente perdimos la oportunidad.

También hay una diferencia muy grande. Leyendo la historia de América Latina, comparada con la historia de Estados Unidos, uno comprende que Latinoamérica no tuvo un John Winthrop español, ni portugués, que viniera con la Biblia en su mano dispuesto a construir “una Ciudad sobre una Colina”, una ciudad que brillara, como fue la pretensión de los peregrinos que llegaron a Estados Unidos.

Hace 50 años, México era más rico que Portugal. En 1950, un país como Brasil tenía un ingreso per cápita más elevado que el de Corea del Sur. Hace 60 años, Honduras tenía más riqueza per cápita que Singapur, y hoy Singapur –en cuestión de 35 ó 40 años– es un país con $40.000 de ingreso anual por habitante. Bueno, algo hicimos mal los latinoamericanos.

¿Qué hicimos mal? No puedo enumerar todas las cosas que hemos hecho mal. Para comenzar, tenemos una escolaridad de 7 años. Esa es la escolaridad promedio de América Latina y no es el caso de la mayoría de los países asiáticos. Ciertamente no es el caso de países como Estados Unidos y Canadá, con la mejor educación del mundo, similar a la de los europeos. De cada 10 estudiantes que ingresan a la secundaria en América Latina, en algunos países solo uno termina esa secundaria. Hay países que tienen una mortalidad infantil de 50 niños por cada mil, cuando el promedio en los países asiáticos más avanzados es de 8, 9 ó 10.

Nosotros tenemos países donde la carga tributaria es del 12% del producto interno bruto, y no es responsabilidad de nadie, excepto la nuestra, que no le cobremos dinero a la gente más rica de nuestros países. Nadie tiene la culpa de eso, excepto nosotros mismos.

En 1950, cada ciudadano norteamericano era cuatro veces más rico que un ciudadano latinoamericano. Hoy en día, un ciudadano norteamericano es 10, 15 ó 20 veces más rico que un latinoamericano. Eso no es culpa de Estados Unidos, es culpa nuestra.

En mi intervención de esta mañana, me referí a un hecho que para mí es grotesco, y que lo único que demuestra es que el sistema de valores del siglo XX, que parece ser el que estamos poniendo en práctica también en el siglo XXI, es un sistema de valores equivocado. Porque no puede ser que el mundo rico dedique 100.000 millones de dólares para aliviar la pobreza del 80% de la población del mundo –en un planeta que tiene 2.500 millones de seres humanos con un ingreso de $2 por día– y que gaste 13 veces más ($1.300.000.000.000) en armas y soldados.

Como lo dije esta mañana, no puede ser que América Latina se gaste $50.000 millones en armas y soldados. Yo me pregunto: ¿quién es el enemigo nuestro? El enemigo nuestro, presidente Correa, de esa desigualdad que usted apunta con mucha razón, es la falta de educación; es el analfabetismo; es que no gastamos en la salud de nuestro pueblo; que no creamos la infraestructura necesaria, los caminos, las carreteras, los puertos, los aeropuertos; que no estamos dedicando los recursos necesarios para detener la degradación del medio ambiente; es la desigualdad que tenemos, que realmente nos avergüenza; es producto, entre muchas cosas, por supuesto, de que no estamos educando a nuestros hijos y a nuestras hijas.

Uno va a una universidad latinoamericana y todavía parece que estamos en los sesenta, setenta u ochenta. Parece que se nos olvidó que el 9 de noviembre de 1989 pasó algo muy importante, al caer el Muro de Berlín, y que el mundo cambió. Tenemos que aceptar que este es un mundo distinto, y en eso francamente pienso que todos los académicos, que toda la gente de pensamiento, que todos los economistas, que todos los historiadores, casi que coinciden en que el siglo XXI es el siglo de los asiáticos, no de los latinoamericanos. Y yo, lamentablemente, coincido con ellos. Porque mientras nosotros seguimos discutiendo sobre ideologías, seguimos discutiendo sobre todos los “ismos” (¿cuál es el mejor? capitalismo, socialismo, comunismo, liberalismo, neoliberalismo, socialcristianismo...), los asiáticos encontraron un “ismo” muy realista para el siglo XXI y el final del siglo XX, que es el pragmatismo . Para solo citar un ejemplo, recordemos que cuando Deng Xiaoping visitó Singapur y Corea del Sur, después de haberse dado cuenta de que sus propios vecinos se estaban enriqueciendo de una manera muy acelerada, regresó a Pekín y dijo a los viejos camaradas maoístas que lo habían acompañado en la Larga Marcha: “Bueno, la verdad, queridos camaradas, es que mí no me importa si el gato es blanco o negro, lo único que me interesa es que cace ratones” . Y si hubiera estado vivo Mao, se hubiera muerto de nuevo cuando dijo que “ la verdad es que enriquecerse es glorioso ”. Y mientras los chinos hacen esto, y desde el 79 a hoy crecen a un 11%, 12% o 13%, y han sacado a 300 millones de habitantes de la pobreza, nosotros seguimos discutiendo sobre ideologías que tuvimos que haber enterrado hace mucho tiempo atrás.

La buena noticia es que esto lo logró Deng Xioping cuando tenía 74 años. Viendo alrededor, queridos Presidentes, no veo a nadie que esté cerca de los 74 años. Por eso solo les pido que no esperemos a cumplirlos para hacer los cambios que tenemos que hacer.

Muchas gracias.

http://www.nacion.com/ln_ee/2009/abril/26/opinion1944940.html

9:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for that post, very worth reading. I've been saying all along, the reason for why LatAm is poor is not the Yanquees, but ourselves. However you'll never win an election in Bolivia promising "Tears, blood and sweat." Evo's supporters preffer to live in denial and believe in a world were they would be rich if it were not for those evil Yanques. After all just look at what all marchistas in Bolivia want: free money.

I recommend reading "A People's History of the US." There you will see that the "Empire" was built upon the sweat, tears and blood of the working class on the US. The wealth of the US does not come from a few bankers, but from these people who believe on the City Upon a Hill, the protestant work ethic of trying to prove your piousness by working. In Bolivia we see the exact opposite. Very few want to work. The blood that is poured is to seek a rent (free money from something). Did Evo promise jobs in his campaign? no he promised to seized other people's assets and distribute all that money, and in the process destroying the few sources of wealth of the country. Even in this forum, you have people like Grindio who think giving Bonos from export revenues is a good thing....end of rant.

11:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree to a large extent Anon 11:00AM, but it's also naive and irresponsible to brush off US involvement in Latin America and its effects as if they were insignificant.

By the way no surprise, but the prosecutor has now called Costas and Marinkovic along with some other Santa Cruz businessman for questioning regarding the Flores case.

Anyone read Marinkovics interview in El Deber today or his youtube response to what's happening? LOL, all of the sudden he's talking about unity and prosperity for Bolivia and Bolivians not just Santa Cruz. Mr Glass is very see-through. The Toborochi clan really screwed up this time.

12:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

12:21, I don't dismiss US involvement but 1)It takes two to tango, and 2) US involvement was pretty much limited to their interests which have revolved mostly around a)cold war balance and b) war on drugs. What supporters of Evo like to imply is that the US wants to keep LatAm poor simply because they are evil and don't to see us prosper.

I'm also no fan of the "civicos," as I said on a earlier post Boliva's choice is basically between the Bad and the Ugly, no Good in this race.

12:32 PM  
Blogger wren said...

I'm a huge fan of writing, and of blogging about writing, and generally loved reading this post as I procrastinate writing my own book, and should be taking that tip about going out of internet range while I try it. Thanks for letting writers know they're not alone!

3:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So any bets on who turns on who first in this whole mess. Acha was smart, he got out of dodge ASAP. Of course Marinkovic couldn't have done that as it would have practically sealed his guilt.

Oh to be a fly on the wall of that meeting all the civicos are having right now on what in the hell they're going to do. Deny deny deny?
Nevermind trying to start their own paramilitary army, those idiots should go to jail simply based off getting a sloppy idiot like Flores to be their general.

What an idiot, looking at his resume you would think the guy was a total pro(I'm sure Branko and the boys thought the same). The old age and not killing anyone in ages must have got him rusty. He left a trail of evidence a blind, deaf and mute could follow.

4:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The role of fly on the wall will be played by a Magnifica...

4:06 PM  
Anonymous El Grindio said...

The role of "sloppy idiot" will be played by Bolivia Libre (if Croats-are-Evo's-jews is not available).

6:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Marinkovic couldn't have done that as it would have practically sealed his guilt"
Oh, really? What did he do when the "Golpe Civico-Prefectural" failed, if it wasn't hide out in the US and Europe until the coast was clear?

6:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

IRONY ALERT:
A prior deceitfully misleading Anon comment that tries to coverup the plot to kill Evo & Bolvia's democracy:
"Morales is such a comedian.... now he says that the HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION had a hand in plotting against him. He just does not stop. http://www.hirtv.hu/kulfold/?article_hid=268834 (in hungarian)"

An insightful comment above: "Acha [HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION dude] was smart, he got out of dodge ASAP"

6:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anyone who takes "Human Rights Foundation" serioulsy is lazy. Do a little research, this group is an absolute joke.

6:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Human Rights Foundation" is probably a front, probably funded by the CIA . ALMOST all of its stated positions are ideological propaganda. If it is tied to the CIA, then is the CIA's dark hand behind the plan to kill Evo and overthrow Bolivia's democratically elected government? Acha is alleged to have been at all the meetings with the Euro-trash terrorists, at COTAs and at the private property of the ganadero's organization.

9:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You overpaid the bootleg dvd Mr. Schultz, going rate is Bs. 4 in the right places, or is that film hard to find?

Good luck writing. As for Zinn, google his comments on recent US intromission in Venezuela and Bolivia, he has been signatory to one or two declarations condemning such meddling.

Funny thing, President Arias' article appeared in today's La Razon, are they pulling content from this blog? Haha. Indeed it takes two to tango, an incompetent and un-visionary elite, and an exploitative Empire to seduce them.

12:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't see ANY evidence of the US exploiting people in Bolivia. I think you are confusing them with Europeans, neighbooring countries, and private individuals. The US simply did not want Bolivia to go Red or become a Narco state and these have not been "profitable" enterprises. We are not talking about the United Fruit Company and marines invading Bolivia after all.

The question is why do the people keep maintaing the same corrupt, unvisionary elite in power? Even the MAS is full and controlled by these "elites".

1:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That is a good question, although I wouldn't say MAS or the government is full of these "elites", they are present. I was thinking more of the Santa Cruz elites, at that moment... I think part of the answer is that the right people who would do a better job are scared away by the corruption and known problems/headaches in public service in Bolivia. It is no way to make a living if you aren't there to steal or benefit your circle. Others for ideological reasons did not seize what I think was an opportunity to join the bandwagon and thus lead it in a better direction than those who joined for less honorable reasons.

On the other hand, one might consider the whole of south or latin America as one nation, in which case the United Fruit's exploitation was also against Bolivia. Does this type of oppression continue today? Perhaps not, but this sort of thing over two hundred years created the conditions in which today "Europeans, neighboring countries, and private individuals" or any others can more easily exploit our people and our needs born out of extreme poverty.

3:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That is a good question, although I wouldn't say MAS or the government is full of these "elites", they are present. I was thinking more of the Santa Cruz elites, at that moment... I think part of the answer is that the right people who would do a better job are scared away by the corruption and known problems/headaches in public service in Bolivia. It is no way to make a living if you aren't there to steal or benefit your circle. Others for ideological reasons did not seize what I think was an opportunity to join the bandwagon and thus lead it in a better direction than those who joined for less honorable reasons.

On the other hand, one might consider the whole of south or latin America as one nation, in which case the United Fruit's exploitation was also against Bolivia. Does this type of oppression continue today? Perhaps not, but this sort of thing over two hundred years created the conditions in which today "Europeans, neighboring countries, and private individuals" or any others can more easily exploit our people and our needs born out of extreme poverty.

3:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jim:
enjoy your stay writing quietly in a colonial hotel. The Croats in this blog are suspiciously quiet, perhaps they are part of the plot. How about the members of the human "rights? group? Just read the names, all worms gusanos from Miami, or sold outs idiots like Vargas lloza. I am sure they have other bolivian members like tuto the good boy from texas.

7:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Croats served the Nazis, and even outdid them in brutality.
The Serbs fought them.
That tells you something.

11:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Number 1...JFYI (i know you only like to deal with facts)...there is no novel called "Blade Runner". The movie was taken from the novel "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?". by P.K.Dick


JD

12:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I never claimed that "Blade Runner" itself was a novel, JD, but rather attempted to compare Jim's dark tone of the first paragraph with that of the movie.

Interesting tip, though.

;-)

The Croats are Morales' Jews
Beni is Morales' Katrina

1:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder... now that ALL and every single "witness" of this case has clearly stated that their testimonies were forged and that they were tortured and brutalized by Morales government goons. Now that there are no doubts about the political nature of this witch hunt, who will be held responsible for the manslaughter of three european citizens?, who will repair the damage to the good name of people like Alejandro Melgar, Hugo acha, or any of the other thirty two people unfairly persecuted? who will repair the damege done to Gueder and Toaso?
Is it enough just to be a little on the left to be out of justice range?

7:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So now with all the evidence of this case as a bolivian government staged show, and a more tha evident Cold Blood murder of three europeans without a single proof (Even the explosives were "skillfully" planted by the police and even more "skillfully" recorded by the UTARC) how many of the ranting and willing executioners of Institutions like HRF would have the decency of taking back their nonsense? none I bet.

1:59 AM  
Anonymous usb flash 64gb said...

There is indeed something to learn from the fact that the Croats served the Nazis, and even outdid them in brutality, while the Serbs fought them.

3:32 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home