Saturday, June 27, 2009

Ambassadorial Moves

Last September, in the midst of violence by opposition groups in the Bolivian departments of Santa Cruz and Pando, President Evo Morales accused U.S. Ambassador Phillip Goldberg of having a clandestine hand in that violence and ordered him out of the country.

That set off a chain reaction of diplomatic tit-for-tats. The Bush administration kicked out Bolivia's ambassador to Washington, Gustavo Guzman, then "decertified" the Morales government's anti-coca program and based on that cut Bolivia from the ATPDEA trade preference program. Unable to resist a good diplomatic mud-wrestling match with Washington, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez pushed himself into the game and kicked out the U.S. ambassador to his country as well, leading to the Bush administration's ouster of Venezuela's ambassador to the U.S.

By the time it was over. this diplomatic version of "screw you, no screw you", left behind four embassies operating on auto-pilot, a path or torched diplomatic relations, and with the elimination of the trade preferences, thousands of Bolivian workers with their jobs on the line.

Well, this week, as part of the ongoing game of making nice between the Obama administration and the Chavez government, the two countries announced that they are returning their respective ambassadors to Caracas and Washington. U.S. Ambassador Patrick Duddy and Venezuelan Ambassador Bernardo Alvarez are dusting off their suitcases and getting ready to return to their former diplomatic outposts. This follows Obama's and Chavez's "all smiles" visit in April at the Summit of the Americas in Tobago.

So what about the diplomatic rift that started it all, between the Washington and La Paz?

Interestingly, even as Chavez, the supposed "bad boy" among the South American left presidents is rebuilding bridges, Morales' moves with the U.S. are still sour. At Tobago, while Chavez was handing Obama a book to read, Morales was demanding that the U.S. President declare that his fingerprints weren't on the alleged assassination conspiracy linked to four men killed by government troops in Santa Cruz.

So, will U.S. and Bolivian ambassadors be returning to their posts anytime soon? Certainly, the same ambassadors won't be, as in the case of Venezuela.

Former Ambassador Goldberg probably wouldn't choose to return to La Paz for all the saltenas in Cochabamba, given the constant state of combat between he and Morales. This week Mr. Goldberg was handed his new U.S. diplomatic assignment, leading the U.S. team in charge of implementing sanctions against the government of North Korea over its recent atomic tests. That probably fits Mr. Goldberg better anyway, who in Bolivia seemed much more at ease chastising foreign leaders than forming good relations with them, a task that Morales never made especially easy.

Former Ambassador Guzman, who I visited with a couple of months after his return to La Paz, probably wouldn't head back to Washington for all the Starbucks coffee in Dupont Circle. He and his family, including a new baby, seemed quite happy to be back home in Bolivia once more.

This past week Secretary of State Clinton sent an emissary to talk with Morales, following up on a high level U.S. diplomatic mission here not long before. Clearly the Obama administration would like to get its Bolivian relations in order. Where Morales is on this is anyone's guess.

But if an announcement between La Paz and Washington is forthcoming, akin to the one this week between Washington and Caracas, both countries will have to go through the process of nominating and approving a new pair of ambassadors.

In Washington that process will likely go smoothly, with few in the Senate likely to challenge whomever President Obama selects (I am betting on a Latino or Latina). In La Paz the case may be different. The opposition in the Senate already denied, last year, President Morales' appointment of Pablo Solon as Ambassador to the UN (he now essentially serves in that post, but under a different title). That was pure politics, given the fact that Solon is probably the most able representative Bolivia could have in the U.S.

So watch in the next week or two for signs that Bolivia and the U.S. are ready to follow suit with Venezuela and refill the ambassador positions in their respective capitals. And then watch for it to get weird, as U.S./Bolivia relations just seem to have a tendency to do.

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mr Morales will skip around the constitutional way to appoint Bolivia's diplomats (as he does with everything else) and appoint Mr Solon as the third secretary of the enbassy (actually acting as the ambassador) as he now does at the UN. One more blow to the law.. what the heck!

5:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:29
What law are you talking about? Obama and Morales can appoint anyone they desire. Only in Bolivia they keep talking about the school of diplomats, ...what a joke.
The foreign service in USA exists, but the president appoints as embassadors anybody he pleases. So why does Evo have to appoint the white rich kids who are accepted in the Cancilleria school of diplomats? Have you seen the graduates of that school? Brat children of the rich with white skin or members of the same corrupted families ruling Bolivia for centuries. Now let's cry democracy!

8:44 AM  
Blogger El Grindio said...

In the US, fundraisers (particularly according to ability as bundlers) and friends get the ambassadorships. It's the US spoils system. Obama is just as guilty as his predecessors. So lay off of Morales. Or at least do a modicum of research for a basis of attack.

From the Detroit Free Press:
"Like his predecessors, Obama appoints fundraisers and friends as ambassadors
BY ROB HOTAKAINEN • MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS • JUNE 14, 2009"

1:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The correct thing todo is apoint Carrer Diplomats like Duddy in Venezuela or Donna Hrinak that was here in Bolivia then Venezuela. Although some times friends or party members are appointed, the people that go are respresenting our country and have todo so with all the protocol that comes with each event, and sending people like some of our current ministers is only going to embarass Bolivia even more in all the events they go to, the least they should do is send these people to the diplomats school for a crash course on protocol. And I told you people about the milk plants and the truth finally came out. History will prove us right when Evo Morales goes down as the FOOL who blew his golden chance and now has lost complete perspective on improving our country and is campaining not for equality but for revenge.

9:44 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What difference would an ambassador if he represents a deceitful leader like Obama is showing himself to be:

LA PAZ, Bolivia — President Evo Morales on Wednesday accused Barack Obama of lying by pledging to change America's historically heavy-handed relationship with Latin America and then halting $25 million in annual trade benefits for Bolivia.

The U.S. on Tuesday said it is ending the import duty waivers because world's No. 3 cocaine-producing country is not doing enough to reduce "unconstrained" cultivation of coca.

Morales said the move contradicts Obama's promise at the Summit of the Americas in April to be a peer rather than an overseer of countries in the region. "President Obama lied to Latin America when he told us in Trinidad and Tobago that there are not senior and junior partners," he told reporters.

The former coca-growers' union leader, who expelled U.S. drug agents from his country last year, said the U.S. trade representative used "pure lies and insults" to justify its decision.

The trade office said there has been "explicit acceptance and encouragement of coca production at the highest levels of the Bolivian government."

Bolivia, which considers coca a sacred crop that has many traditional uses other than cocaine, says the U.S. move will cost the impoverished country about 20,000 jobs, particularly in textiles and leather. The country has had only limited success in developing alternatives to U.S. markets, said the of the Bolivian Foreign Trade Institute, Gary Rodriguez, told The Associated Press that Bolivia has had limited success in trying to compensate for the anticipated loss of U.S. markets and that he expected Tuesday's announcement to lead to layoffs.

"Neither Venezuela, Iran, Argentina or even Brazil have so far worked as alternative markets," he said.

Venezuela had promised to buy $13 million in goods over the past year but the La Paz exporter's association, CAME, said Venezuela lacks the U.S. dollars to pay for them.

The U.S. is extending tariff exemptions for Ecuador for another six months as part of the Andean Trade Preference Act, but Ecuador, Peru and Colombia will see those duty-free privileges expire at year's end. The region's cocaine-producing and transit countries have been allowed to export thousands of products to the United States duty-free since 1991 in hopes that income from legal exports will help wean peasants off selling coca, but that hasn't happened.

The U.S. government estimates Bolivia's potential cocaine yield at 195 metric tons, and Morales himself said Wednesday that coca cultivation is up in Bolivia _ by 6 percent last year by U.N. survey. But he said his government is making a good-faith control effort.

U.S. drug agents say landlocked Bolivia exports most of its cocaine to Europe through Brazil and Argentina. The trade office said the DEA previously had 57 employees in four Bolivian cities. Now those agents are spread elsewhere across the region, leaving what U.S. law enforcement officials call a black hole in Bolivia.

___

7:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Where is the deceitful part? ATPDEA was meant to get people to knit sweaters instead of digging maceration pits, and it's clearly not working anymore (if it ever did). If Bolivia wants a free trade agreement with the US, they should try to negotiate one, not claim "good faith efforts" at fighting cocaine production - after throwing out DEA.

1:40 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

don't waste your time anon 1:40. Unfortunately the MAS leadership and their supporters think that you can agree to fight drugs in exchange for trade preferences, not meet your end of the bargain, and still have the right to access the trade preferences. This type of hypocrisy is endemic in Morales administration.

Regaring the potential ambassador, I cannot think of a better person than Solon for ambassador. Another hipocryt who opposes a FTA based on, among other things, his rejection of intellectual property right, yet finances his foundation using the proceeds from monies coming from the intellectual property rights he holds from his dad's artwork. Talk about a revolutionary trust fund baby.

So the downrotten spiral will continue for a couple more years. The situation in Guatemala is very interesting, because it can easily happen in Bolivia. A populist leader tries to perpetuate himself in power, despite being unpopular, tries to game the situation. A incredibly incompetent opposition, makes a bonehead move, and makes Morales seem like a stateman, despite being the worst Bolivian President since Melgarejo.

10:04 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You have to be kidding: "...given the fact that Solon is probably the most able representative Bolivia could have in the U.S." He is a college dropout that spent his many years at the University organizing student unions for petty purposes. He runs the cancilleria and he is responsible for the failure of the trade agreements with the European Union. Choquehuanca is busy with his new age/ pachamamista riddles: "Am I here, am I not". He is a ignorant as Evo. Solon is a typical member of the La Paz elite that surrounds Evo, they talk about equality and revolution yet they drive BMW's and have lavish lifestyles. He must be your friend. It was naive to expect that Obama would reinstate the ATPDEA, since coca growing and cocaine production have increased with Evo (of course only in El Chapare where his cocalero unions are, in other places like Yungas Vandiola he would send the army to shoot at cocaleros)

11:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Our government has a tendency to dictate to other sovereign nations. This in violation of the UN Charter and International Law. Pres Morales should not have to bow down to our President. Pres Morales has stated that people who grow Coca is to be used only for consumption. He is against Coca growers and others who are trying to convert coca leaves into cocaine! His military forces are out searching for those who are attempting to make cocaine and when caught these products are destroyed on the spot. Coca is their main product. Apparently there is a double standard whereby the Afghans continue growing poppy, selling it on the international market in order to purchase more military weapons etc.

7:25 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home