Friday, September 04, 2009

The Second (or Third) Coming of Manfred Reyes Villa

In Bolivia, national elections have become something like Easter. There seems to be one a year but never on the same day. Next December 6th Bolivians will go once again to the polls, for the fourth time in as many years. They will decide whether to give President Evo Morales an unprecedented second term under a new constitution that now allows the nation’s President to seek re-election.

For months a collection of would-be candidates have jockeyed for position, seeking to forge alliances among the wickedly fragmented opposition and forge a candidacy that might actually challenge Morales. It is a field that has included, among others, a former President, a former Vice-President, a former-Governor, a prominent mayor and others.

But now, after four years of fumbling and failing to generate a genuine national opposition to Morales, it looks like one might finally be emerging. The leader of that coalescing opposition is not a new face in Bolivian politics, but one of its most well-known – former Cochabamba Governor Manfred Reyes Villa.

This week candidate Reyes Villa made headlines with his selection of a running mate who will have to wage his campaign from a jail cell in La Paz. He will be joined on his ticket by the imprisoned ex-Governor of Pando, Leopoldo Fernandez. His pick for Vice-President awaits trial over charges that he played a leading role in the massacre of a dozen supporters of Morales in his state last September.

Who is Manfred Reyes Villa? What are his chances of unseating Morales? What does all this say for the current state of play of Bolivian politics?

First, some background.

Evo vs. the Fragmented Pack

For most of the three decades since Bolivia returned to democracy, until 2005, Bolivian national politics was a simple and straightforward game of musical chairs. Three political parties essentially rotated the Presidency among themselves every five years, each taking a turn to benefit from the spoils of political power.

In 1993 and in 2002 it was the conservative ghost of Bolivia's old revolutionary party, MNR, which bartered itself into the Presidency, led by Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada (Goni). When Sánchez de Lozada and the MNR were retired from the Presidency by the one-term rule, an odd-couple "mega-coalition" took over, farming out the Presidency alternatively to two once-adversaries, Jaime Paz Zamora of MIR and dictator-turned-democrat Hugo Banzer of the ADN.

None of these parties ever garnered much more than a quarter of the popular vote and the differences between them didn’t go much farther than their party logos and selection of which political family would be rewarded with government jobs. In terms of policy all adhered carefully to the fundamentalist economic policies pushed by the World Bank and IMF and the repressive anti-drug policies insisted on by Washington.

The elections of December 2005, however, changed that formula completely, in two ways.

First, Bolivians elected a new President and a new party to office, with a historic 53% majority that dwarfed that received by any of his rotating predecessors. The political wave that gave Bolivia its first indigenous President also dispensed the MIR and ADN to history and left the once dominant MNR party of Sánchez de Lozada with nothing more than eight seats out of more than 150 in the Bolivian Congress.

Second, Bolivia dramatically changed the way it selected the Governors of its nine departments. These powerful positions – sources of massive job patronage and opportunities for corruption – had always been filled by Presidential appointment. Under reforms adopted in 2005 those Governors were now elected directly by a vote of the people.

When Morales took office in January 2006, Bolivia’s political map left the opposition parties in Congress in tatters and shifted that opposition to the governors, a majority of whom were stuanchly if not radically opposed to the new President and his plans for “the change.” This was opposition of a very different sort.

Here we break for a short political science lesson.

In most democracies the tug of war between government and opposition takes place in the national Congress (or its equivalent). Both sides vie for a national base that can back its proposals and position it to win the Presidency the next time around. Bolivia’s opposition governors, however, were operating in a whole other world.

In the departments of Santa Cruz, Chuquisaca, Tarija, Beni, and Pando the local governors advanced their political positions not by using moderation to build a national base, but by using heated rhetoric and tactics to feed anti-Morales fervor among their local political base. Morales, inclined to confrontation as a habit, gave the same right back at them.

What this meant is that, while Morales has had to contend with a political opposition that could fill the streets and shut down major cities with protest and violence, he has not faced any significant political force that can challenge him nationally at the polls. While anti-Morales forces were turning out people by the tens of thousands in Santa Cruz, Morales has been traveling the country, handing out bonuses for students, tractors to campesino farmers and solidifying a base of political support among rural people, the poor, and working class voters in he cities that has turned him into Evo the Invincible at the ballot box.
```
In three national elections in three years Morales and MAS only increased the strong base of support they had in 2005. Over the course of a July 2006 vote for delegates to a national Constituent Assembly, the August 2008 referendum on the continued service of Evo and the Governors, and last January’s vote to approve a new Bolivian constitution, Morales built up his base enough to win a stunning 2/3 of the vote.

Manfred the Political Daredevil

As politicians go, in any country, Manfred Reyes Villa is an interesting study – a man with an uncanny ability to repeatedly snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Reyes Villa is a former Army Captain with close ties to one of his country's most repressive dictatorships. In the early 1980s he served as the personal guard to the brutal Luís García Meza. Later however, he shed his uniform and converted himself into a very successful local Cochabamba politician.

In 1993 Reyes Villa was elected to his first of four terms as Mayor. Despite ever-present vague charges of corruption (his then-political party, NFR earned the street nickname, “Nuevo Forma de Robar" – New Way to Steal), Reyes Villa became a popular figure. He used deep excursions into public debt to help finance big, flashy public works projects, including a shiny new airport and the planet's largest statue of Jesus.

In 2002 as Bolivia headed into a new round of Presidential elections it truly looked like Manfred's year. The handsome Mayor led his nearest rival in the polls, Sánchez de Lozada seeking a return to office, by nearly two to one. The third major candidate, Evo Morales, didn't even seem a factor.

Then a team of U.S. political consultants hired by Sánchez de Lozada went to work on Manfred-the-frontrunner.

In a campaign captured brilliantly in the documentary "Our Brand is Crisis", the Goni camp hammered away relentlessly at Manfred 'the former military man' (using an old photo of the candidate in uniform) and used aerial photos of his family's numerous real estate holdings in Bolivia and Florida to remind voters of the corruption charges that seemed to swirl always around him. Reyes Villa's support started to plunge.

Then just before the vote, the U.S. Ambassador delivered a final blow. Washington’s chief diplomat issued a withering public attack against Morales and threatened a cutoff of U.S. aid if Bolivians elected the cocalero as President. Offended voters flocked to Morales, nearly boosting him into first place. Most of those votes came right out of Reyes Villa’s electoral hide. He finished a disappointing third.

But less than a year later Cochabamba’s erstwhile Mayor seemed to be once again sitting pretty.

After the election Reyes Villa refused overtures by Sánchez de Lozada to join the MNR's governing coalition, forgoing the chance to dole out thousands of government jobs to his supporters. Instead he settled in as an opposition figure and almost immediately Sánchez de Lozada's tepid public support began to diminish even more. In February 2003 Sánchez de Lozada called for a tax increase on the country’s working poor in order to meet the IMF’s belt-tightening demands, setting off political conflicts that left 34 Bolivians dead. Being on the outside of the governing coalition was looking like a better and better place to be.

Then just months afterwards, Reyes Villa did the political equivalent of buying a ticket for passage on the Titanic after it had already hit the iceberg and was headed to the bottom of the Atlantic.

Surprising most everyone, Reyes Villa suddenly reversed course and threw his political support behind the embattled President. As a reward he was given political control of Cochabamba’s state government and with it hundreds of jobs to dole out to supporters. But he also grafted his political fortunes to Sánchez de Lozada's just as his old adversary was headed to his political grave. In October 2003 Sánchez de Lozada sent out troops to shoot down protests against his gas and oil export plans. Reyes-Villa’s new ally resigned in a political storm and headed to exile in Maryland. Only months into his new alliance Reyes-Villa was left with behind with only deep voter memories of he and the deposed President smiling side by side.

Then in 2005 Manfred saw the opportunity for a political comeback and took it.

He opted out of an iffy second run at the Presidency and chose instead to enter a much safer race to become the new elected Governor of the state of Cochabamba. He stitched together his old support base in the city and added on to it new support in the countryside with promises of the same kind of public works that had made him so popular as Mayor. Against a weak MAS candidate hand-picked by Morales, Reyes Villa won the new Governor post handily.

In his first year as Governor, once again, Manfred looked to be in great political shape. While other governors waged bitter battles with Morales over issues like regional autonomy, a sunny Reyes Villa just kept on paving roads, cutting ribbons, and using public funds to put his photo, scissors in hand, in the Sunday papers (just as Evo does with national funds).

Then, as 2006 drew to a close, Reyes Villa demonstrated once again his curious knack for shooting himself in the foot when he stepped out of the familiar world of local politics and tried to go national.

In a move that seemed mostly aimed at baiting Morales supporters in Cochabamba, Reyes Villa called for a re-vote on the regional autonomy issue, just months after Cochabamba voters had soundly defeated it. He also called for Morales to resign. The President's backers took the bait fully, marched onto the Governor's office and burned it, sending Reyes Villa fleeing. When backers of Reyes Villa and Morales confronted one another in the streets of Cochabamba on January 11, 2007, three men were left dead and scores of others badly wounded. Reyes Villa took local political peace and set it ablaze underneath his feet.

Then Reyes Villa through down another gauntlet directly at Morales, calling for a national referendum that would force each of the nine governors and the President and Vice-President to all submit their political futures anew to the voters. Morales eventually called the opposition's bluff and in August 2008 Bolivian voters went back to the polls once more. Morales was continued in office by a vote of nearly 2/3. Reyes Villa was defeated badly and was cast yet again into political exile.

Until now.

In Search of a Unified Opposition

There are many reasons why opponents of Morales would wish to have a unified campaign against him in the December vote. The biggest one is this. Under the new Bolivian constitution a candidate can be elected without a second round runoff under two circumstances. The first is how Morales won in December 2005 – winning the backing of a majority of voters (50% plus 1). However, even if Morales does not win that majority again on December 6th he can still escape a runoff against his nearest challenger if no other candidate comes within 10% of his total. In other words, if Morales finishes with just 40% of the vote, he escapes a runoff as long as no one else cracks past 30%.

It is little wonder then that Morales and his backers have looked gleefully upon the usual battles of personal ego and political rivalry that have divided his opposition into limp little chunks.

Under normal circumstances the national opposition leader would be former President Jorge Quiroga, who heads the main opposition party in Congress (PODEMOS) and who finished second (a poor second) to Morales in 2005. But the bookish Quiroga is a weak political figure at best, so much so that his PODEMOS party has basically ceased to function.

This in turn has left a half dozen other serious candidates trying to vie for the position of lead challenger to Evo. One of them was Sánchez de Lozada’s former Vice-President, Victor Hugo Cardenas. They Aymara scholar seemed to generate some early steam behind his candidacy last March after a mob of Morales backers attacked his altiplano home, but since then his candidacy has fizzled. Today he announced his withdrawl from the race but endorsed no one else (for now). Presidential wannabe Samuel Doria Media, owner of the country’s Burger Kings, can’t seem to get anyone to take his second attempt at the presidency seriously. The rest of the prospective field includes a pair of other indigenous alternatives to Morales, including the Mayor of Potosi. But none of them seem to have any hope of carving into Morales’ solid base.

Then there is Reyes Villa.

In the past few weeks, the once Mayor and Governor of Bolivia’s third largest voter block seems to be stitching together an alliance of those most disgruntled with Morales. This includes a young Santa Cruz woman who was once a Morales protégé and MAS member of the city council, the current Governor of Beni, the past Governor of La Paz, and a growing list of well-known opposition figures.

With his selection of the jailed Fernandez as his running mate Reyes Villa is now positioned to win support from the most hard-line adversaries of Morales, including the conservatives and wealthy elites of vote-rich Santa Cruz.

In short, while it seems unlikely that all of the various corners of the opposition will fold their tents and join forces with Reyes Villa, he has clearly established himself as the only serious candidate the opposition has and in politics that counts for a lot.

What All this Means

If past history and current polls are any measure of voter sentiment, Morales is headed to a second term regardless of how well Reyes Villa does at shedding his old curse when he goes national. Journalists and pundits may focus attention on the heated anti-Evo sentiment to be found in he cities, but once you head beyond the city limits you find community after community where Morales can count on support that measures 80% and higher. This includes the largest population cluster in the country, La Paz, El Alto and the altiplano.

The chances of Reyes Villa unseating Morales or even forcing him into a runoff remain extremely remote. What this does mean, however, is a few other important things:

First, even if he loses in December, Reyes Villa is likely to end up the undisputed leader of the national opposition and that opposition is likely to be much stronger that any Morales has faced in his first term. Even if the new constitution’s formula for electing Congress gives MAS new advantages to securing majorities in both houses, whatever minority Reyes Villa ends up with will be a lot more strategic and forceful than the current one, because it will be part of a national opposition instead of a fragmented regional one.

Second, if he plays his political cards right (which is still a leap) Reyes Villa will also be very well-positioned for a third Presidential run in 2014. If the rules of the new constitution hold (I’ll get to that in a minute) Morales will not be allowed to run for a third term when his second one expires. By design, Morales has made his MAS party a political vehicle for only one national candidate, himself. There is no one else being groomed to succeed him and it is unlikely that MAS can field anyone else who can hold onto his base. One scenario is that in a post-Evo world MAS will start to fray apart along the lines that divide it internally.

Or there is this scenario – the far more likely one.

Morales and MAS will wait for their moment and will propose that the new constitution be amended once more, allowing Evo to run yet again. If and when they do that, watch for all hell to break loose. If there is one thing that scares Morales opponents more than any other – more than land reform, more than national takeovers of private businesses, more than alliances with Hugo Chavez – it is Evo in a perpetual presidency for life.

A perpetual presidency is also, as a matter of practice, a bad idea. Governing regimes that feel unchallenged make bad policy, invite corruption, and dilute democracy to something less than real democracy.

In my view as a democrat with a small “d” Bolivia does need an opposition that functions. MAS and Morales will govern better if they are challenged at the polls, if they are challenged on policy and ideas, and if they know people are looking over their shoulders for mismanagement and corruption. They will govern worse without those things.

To be clear, I am not saying that an opposition led by Cochabamba's former Mayor will deliver those things. There is a good chance it won’t. But what is sure is that for the first time in the Morales presidency a genuine national opposition is forming and it likely to change the political path ahead, in ways we can anticipate and in ways we can’t.

Okay commenters -- have at it!

43 Comments:

Blogger john_rice said...

Jim,,,
The more I read of your analysis, the more convinced I am that you have an agenda, other than informing others, that is.
Why that is, I don't know, and you don't explain.
Where is your funding coming from, Jim? Perhaps that might explain.
Did I read correctly it is at least in part from Soros' neoliberal billions?
Why does it seem like you are adding to the anti-Morales media frenzy?
How has he governed so wrongly, and why are you so dismissive of his efforts?
What I'd like to suggest is that Morales' successor is hiding in plain sight in the form of his VP, who you do not even mention in your article--not even once--yet you mention if not laud and give credibility to his opponents--even the very marginal ones.
Linera is a seasoned political veteran and supporter of Morales' plan to refound a truly democratic Bolivia. He is formally educated, an excellent speaker, and I believe would make a wonderful successor to Evo, who will support him completely.
As far as another change in the Bolivian constitution is concerned--it just isn't going to happen, or even be attempted--contrary to your wet-dream that it will--at least under Morales.
What I can see that is possible, is that a change allowing Morales to serve again after a different President (Linera??)has been elected and served might be agreed to (though I personally doubt it).
Evo has started Bolivia on the road to democracy that his VP is perfectly situated to continue.
Why does it seem that through the tactic of ignoring and omitting Linera from the discussion, that the Democracy Center does not want him to succeed Evo as president?
Is there another agenda you'd like to tell us about Jim?
Regards,,,John

8:13 AM  
Blogger Sam said...

To me it seems like the next four years (after Morales likely wins) will be great for the contiunued development of human rights in Bolivia, but after those four years, whether Morales carries on for life or MAS is replaced by a corruption-loving oposition, corruption is sure to come.

-sam

9:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Noting the first comment above, what a classic. Jim is "anti-Evo"? Have you not read the years of comments here in which he has been accused of being Evo's one-man PR machine? And this new analysis of yours (John) is based on what -- someone not having an automatic assumption that Alvaro Garcia Linera can just win all the same votes Evo does?

As for the question of Evo seeking another term just look at what he proposed during the constitutional debate, just that. If you really want to put down money that MAS won't try to amend the constitution again on this before 2014 I'll take that bet, with odds.

I am sure the Manfredistas here will come out of the wood work saying Jim is anti-Manfred because of this piece.

I think this was a solid analysis of the realities shaping up toward December's election.

Reader in Sucre

10:46 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"First, even if he loses in December, Reyes Villa is likely to end up the undisputed leader of the national opposition and that opposition is likely to be much stronger that any Morales has faced in his first term."

Jim, this statement is as delusional as Manfred's campaign. Please think before you write your conclusions.

12:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Concerning John's comment.

Jim does have an agenda. It is the same agenda all "non-profits" carry around with them: secure funding from rich white people in the North. The guy has a life and family in Cocha. He is not going to write the kind of analysis that would endanger his livelihood.

12:22 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jim...

"Reyes Villa will also be very well-positioned for a third Presidential run in 2014.If the rules of the new constitution hold (I’ll get to that in a minute) Morales will not be allowed to run for a third term when his second one expires."

If Evo doesn't run for President in 2014, it won't be because the Constitution doesn't allow him to, but because he publicly announced he would not run for re-election in 2014; meeting a condition for the electoral law to be approved by the opposition in the Senate.

Legaly speaking, he is not running for re-election but for election to a first term under the new Constitution, so he would not need to change the Constitution to run again in 2014 if elected in December.

4:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sam,

Corruption has been here since the beginning of time. Left, right or center, it does not matter. Each government has taken turns raping this country. And now it is the MAS's turn.

The current president is a narco-thug and self proclaimed pediphile, his VP a convicted terrorist and marxist, Quintana, a mediocore army officer, who by the way attendind several courses in the US including the Schools of the Americas, is running contriband and meddling in military promotions. Rada and Caseras are running the narco state and using Cuban and Venezuelan backed intellegence collection against the opposition. And the crook Reyes Villa is no better.

Caredenas should run with Quiroga. The only two who get even close to being honest and honorable human beings. And they are the two best educated.
Cardena is closer to Mandela as Evo is colser to Mugabe.

Argentina, Brasil, and Spain all offered investigation assistance into the letter bombs last month, and the current regime declined help. why? because it was an internal MAS fight. Where is all the coverage and government comments now?

Reporters were brutally assualted by government paramilitary forces last week

Evo will win and attempt to run again or his terrorist VP will follow. And the people of Bolivia will suffer yet under another dictatorship

JP

9:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Guilt/causes aside, Manfred was buried after 1/11/08 and this was demonstrated by his revocation with a majority of his home electorate. If that didn't do it, selecting Leopoldo was seriously THE stupidest move possible. However I am grateful. Friend I was with watching that on TV had a fit of rage at the idiocy and I laughed for a long time.

I might have some doubts about the official 9/11/08 story, but the guy is evidently no angel nor was he in his 30 year history going back to the Banzer dictatorship, which is where he acquired lands and feudal power in Pando to begin with.

Hopefully his run fizzles and Doria Medina ends up the major opposition candidate, otherwise they will both split the measly 30% opposition electoral roof and accomplish nothing.

More important though, is who is being selected for senate and plurinational assembly seats, as the oppos will obtain a sizable but minority amount of these especially coming from the 'luna menguante'.

MAS has shown mixed signals, selecting a respected, independent, moderate middle class activist and woman, as its first senatorial candidate in La Paz (4 senators per department, winner takes 2 and then one a piece if i'm not mistaken) but also choosing some folk music stars for assembly seats in Tarija (they would appear to be intended as hand-raisers).

However, ultimately the next congress probably have a MAS simple majority so while I'm voting for Evo, it would be nice if our future opposition congressmen were people willing and able to negotiate with the second Evo presidency in congress, with ideas, and not in the streets or the and mass media as radical elements on both sides prefer.

JP, considering the fact that we live in a narco-world, the demand for coke will never stop and the US military industrial complex prefers to control the trade through proxy friendly governments (Uribe and Calderon) and anti-drug agencies, which ensure that the narcos/FARC don't get too big a share, that weapons companies have a good year and that the lower and middle classes in the US continue their partially drug-induced daze.

Given this state of affairs, the political rise of the coca growers (the only people who don't profit massively from the drug trade but do get shot once in a while) leader could be interpreted as having support from certain non-US sanctioned narco groups, which would go along with the expulsion of DEA and ostensible adoption of new "favorites" (since, have you noticed, in 30 years, drug lords come and go, governments rise and fall, US military increases its presence in South America, but... the demand for cocaine continues), or it could be more of an unexpected gift that the struggles of subsistence farmers for their livelihood and indigenous nations for their sacred leaf coincide with the interests of narcotrafficers.

Either way, not a single link between drug traffiking and Evo has ever been claimed, much less proven, so the label "narco thug" doesn't apply as much as 'cocalero'.

Rather, I would apply the term to Uribe, who has proven ties with Colombian paramilitaries, who in turn have proven to be involved in the drug trade.

This angle is important because the "drug war" is a matter of national and regional sovereignty. As we can see from the recent decriminalization of marijuana in Argentina, and similar trends in Brazil, the regional impetus is towards a new strategy of combating the personal and societal disease of drug abuse. It would be nice if the opposition didn't screw up and try to use 'narco thug' as an issue in the election.

11:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 11:13

Do you think you could get past your narrow mindedness and realize that drugs and the efforts to combat them are multifaceted and don't always fit into a neat idealized box that represents a so called "leftist" or "conservative" political agenda? Is it really a political issue at all? What do you think of that ASSFUCK?

Further more, the decriminalization of drugs in Argentina and Brazil is a similar trend that you can also see in Mexico where they have recently taken steps to legalize small amounts of Marijuana and cocaine to focus their efforts on the larger sources. Yes this is also the so called proxy government that "profits" off of the drug trade in conjunction with Columbia and the United States.

http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-fg-mexico-decriminalize21-2009jun21,0,6336338.story

I have met similar conspiracy minded people just like you who believe that we are ruled by Aliens, shapeshifters or reptiles and we organize ourselves with the label of Freemasonry to ensure the demise of all.

You people make me sick, all you see is politics, "junkies" as Jim would describe himself.

5:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, I'm glad to see you are amenable to civilized disagreement, JP. I don't think I mentioned aliens, shapeshifters (??) or reptiles, or Freemasons. Just the obvious fact that the "drug war" is not, and has not, for 30 years, solved the very real problems of personal and societal drug abuse.

So that leads some very reasonable people to think that its real purpose is not to eliminate "drugs", but to establish a military presence amongst other things. Of course, many people are harmed by "drugs" and many well intentioned people fight "against" them in the "drug war". That is the social issue, and I rather think that the "political" thinking is to try to solve this social issue militarily. What say you of that, my friend?

I think I actually laid out a very non-partisan argument for why things are not black and white, or neatly left or right in our country. I explained why I will vote for Evo but I hope for both MAS and the opposition to select honest, independent, reasonable people for the Plurinational Assembly, so that we all benefit and the politiking goes on in congress, where it should.

I'm surprised and dissapointed that a simple blog comment makes you sick, and draws such bile from you, hope not everyone that thinks like you has this attitude.

Peace

1:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For calling itself the democracy center there is probably something you should realize. Democracy is in no way related to elections or parties, Democracy forms the criminal justice system known as trial by jury. The president is simply an executive figure that carries out the will of the people (after punishment is decided by trial by jury) within a democratic republic. (republicanism is the seperation of powers within a governmental structure) The democratic nation however need not be a republic it may be a monarchy or communal as long as the basis upon which disputes and punishments are settled is genuine trial by jury (jury nullification being the main feature) as set out in magna carta it is a democratic state. If the people constantly expressed their will by not punishing crimes of their peers most espcially the arbitrary ones than it becomes more difficult to be corrupt. Anyways what I'm trying to say is that we detract from the point that bolivia isn't even democratic to begin with and yet we nuture the idea that somehow evo might ruin democracy?? elections are only a tool, a government that proposes laws the people wont agree with will eventually always lose legitamacy but to say elections are democracy makes this blurry. are those who are elected always in it for the good of the people? or what if there was a functioning check on government power would they even bother? the answer in either case is not necessarily and the less people know about democracy and government the less likely a genuine candidate will be found... unless the candidate himself is somewhat ignorant of democracy then maybe there's a chance or perhaps everybody is screwed.

9:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The narcotics problem started in the 1960's in Los Angeles, California during the hippie-era. 1960 many from the criminal industry in Cuba had to flee (together with the Italian-American Mafia) - and the ablebodied were trained by the CIA to become their "Latin Specialists". Back to California 1960's: A militant "Black Power Movement" surged out of "control" - thus an ideal solution was to subvert young militants by helping them "going into business" selling narcotics to the "hippies" and the whole "Woodstock Nation". Back to Miami: The Cuban Exiles working for the CIA "flew" many missions into Latin America - and they did not leave from or return to "Miami International Airport". Go Miami and see what "homes" are owned by the Cuban Exiles who "flew" for the CIA! The Latin Military had the "perk" of landing on U.S. Mainland Air Bases - with their national military aircraft - and could "bring up" and "take down" - whatever they thought was profitable. This started in 1954 after the CIA-directed Guatemalan Military ousted Praesident Jacobo Arbenz (who did not offer enough money for uncultivated land owned by the United Fruit Company). Those Guatemalan Military Aircraft landed on U.S. Air Force Fields in the State of Texas. One of the Guatelaman Coloneles became Consul of Guatemala with office in the International Trade Mart in New Orleans (1954). Notice in 1963 - in relation to the John F. Kennedy assasination, the International Trade Mart in New Orleans became an important element in the investigation: However, the International Trade Mart had moved by 1963 - from its previous site in 1954. Nevertheless - the whole complex is certainly very interesting: Narcotics, the CIA, the Latin Military, the need to clamp down on domestic militants. The key fact is: The narcotics problem started in the USA, not anywhere in Latin America!

9:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the last use of democracy is in the definition connotated in this article meaning "Free" and "Honest" elections. this is a false democracy and more likely leads to an ochlocracy. as opposed to trial by jury which is democracy.

9:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

mmm...vieron las golpizas que los del MAS dieron a Alejo Veliz y tambien a seguidores de Manfred (a un miembro de la juvenil pacena salio en TV con cara ensangrentada).

Esto es lo que el MAS entiende por democracia. No importa cuantas definiciones le quieran dar; la democracia del momento es irracional, sin justicia y sin libertad de expresion.

Poncho Asustado.

1:43 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

JP 9:16
You should really get informed before you make such statements.

1:54 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

whatever you think of the guy,this handsome devil sure knows how to sport a moustache and take care of his hair.

8:27 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why is this so hard to understand? In a democracy the people elect the leader they want and she or he then is put in charge of the powers of the state assigned to the job. Evo won last time by a clear majority and will do the same in December. If the complainers here don't like him as President, then run a candidate that can beat him. If Manfred is the best you can do, that is your problem.

11:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Para ser justos con mi anterior comentario, "Simpatizantes de Germán Antelo golpean a masistas"

http://www.la-razon.com/versiones/20090909_006845/nota_249_875732.htm

El chiste del dia:

"El vicepresidente Álvaro García Linera acusó a Manfred Reyes Villa, postulante a la Presidencia por el frente Plan Progreso para Bolivia, de encabezar una derecha “que sólo ofrece violencia” a los bolivianos."

Poncho Asustado

12:09 PM  
Anonymous Poncho Asustado said...

"El Gobierno autorizó la realización de referendos por autonomía indígena en 19 municipios"

http://www.la-razon.com/versiones/20090909_006845/nota_249_875733.htm

I like decentralization...I just hope community needs are going to be stronger than corruption at this municipal areas.

Poncho Asustado

12:13 PM  
Anonymous Poncho Asustado said...

Hey, put the political guns to rest...and grab a baseball bat; but to play the game!!

If you live in Cochabamba, check the Baseball and Softball association at: http://beisbolcochabamba.blogspot.com/

We actually play baseball in all departments but Pando, Beni, not sure about Potosi...but I don't know if they have web presence.

We would like to have a "gringito" team in Cochabamba league; we play in "Laguna Alalay, frente a la feria".

If you feel like maybe doing some volunteer work with little league (or any other questions), please contact ASBC president at: juanrogergs@gmail.com

Ok, back to democracy

Poncho Asustado

12:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Poncho, decentralization (Participacion Popular) also had its learning curve, at first mayors would steal the new cash but now they either get removed or burned alive (dark humour I know) and rural communities are visibly improving their infrastructure and services. As always, a strong opposition is the best fiscalizador to avoid that corruption.

Mob violence... reference the hanging of reformist President Gualberto Villaroel in 1940? By an angry mob likely incited by oligarchic/elite/rosca interests of the time.

Now we see the same thing from MAS radical "base" and SCZ MNR or the eastern "autonomists". In all cases this is condemnable, but clearly the opposition needs a figure with enough social legitimacy and cojones to put a stop to this with great personal sacrifice and risk and a mass civilian movement. Hmm, maybe they should stop isolating 80% of the electorate by choosing genocidal ex dictatorship supporters as running mates.

Seriously, four years later y vuelven con Manfred?

2:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

what's so great bout democracy,jimorino?

Ccastro,husein,chavez,evo,mugabe,hitler wre all elected "democratically". Demos is more about ballots,got it,compadre?

Ya need insttitutions that work and a free society,bro!

3:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:11

Yeah, I can see from this post how the Democracy Center is absolutely in disagreement with what you say. Imagine, analyzing an election -- how fucking anti-democratic.

4:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pour Jim. A bad guy with too much hate for Manfred.
Jim schultz lives in Cochabamba many years disguissed of journalist but playing to be a politician.
He finnances the criminal career of Evo, who killed the Andrade couple in Chapare.
Manfred builded Cochabamba and was the only one who defeats Evo in his nest.
Wait Jim, because this summer Reyes Villa gonna should you a great lesson of really democracy.

10:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, I hear Manfred is really kicking himself now about picking Leopoldo. If he waited a week longer he could have gone with that Camba who hijacked the plane in Mexico. Once you have gone the direction of criminals, why not go for the real loonies?

10:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

lol 10:23. 10:53... i'm just guessing, but you probably can write better english than that. nice try appearing to write "bolivian english". actually, have you heard of online spell-check? Manfred robo, pero hizo, pero tambien fue revocado. what makes you think he would win even Coch this time?

11:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The DOL issued a report recently on child and forced labor. Bolivia made the list. Not suprising while some highland industries, like mining, were cited as using child labor, many eastern agricultural industries were cited as using force labor. Evo's past claims of indentured servitude in the east were not as specious as the opposition claimed.

http://www.dol.gov/ilab/programs/ocft/PDF/2009TVPRA.pdf

12:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The narcotics problem started in the 1960's in Los Angeles, California during the hippie-era"

ok... whatever... Nixon or Reagan or whoever you are....really the "government problem" started in the 1960's, that is, the problem of how they started dealing with drug users and fighting drug suppliers and on top of it their whole slew of crappy propaganda

didn't you ever hear of Bella Lugosi or Robert Mitchum? Walt Disney?

JD

p.s. i love it how some of the responses make the whole world better by eliminating hippies...crack up

12:55 PM  
Anonymous chasqui said...

How about Freud or the Opium war, or the Odyssey and the Lotus Eaters?

The fact the Manfred, Doria Medina, Pepe Lucho, etc are candidates, just shows that the "change" Evo was supposed to bring about has become a colossal failure, at the very least the aforementioned should be in jail. Even members of his own base are starting to recognized that the MAS has now evolved into a patronage corrupt organization. Just like ADN, MIR, MNR, favors are asked and paid out in the form of political appointments.

Do the campesinos, despite voting for the MAS, have a say in who is going to represent their district? No and thus the endless roadblocks and what not. How about a little devolution? is that asking for too much?

-

4:18 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think we could even go back to 1930's "reefer madness" as the time when the government problem started wrt "drugs", and definitely it started in the US even then as a racist policy that singled out african americans and hippies lol

MAS is becoming discredited and by 2012, who knows how hated they will be. but notice that Evo and Alvaro stay clean and above the fray... excellent politicians, the opposition is truly a joke beside them.

5:28 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There hae been fewer roadblocks and disruptive protests under Evo...

6:04 PM  
Anonymous your junkie buddy said...

para mi cuate JP

6:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

EIGHT REASONS WHY MANFRED IS NOW THE LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION

1. Tuto Quiroga: The man from IBM sales in Texas has such a natural connection with the Bolivian people, it is easy to understand why he is one of the nation's most beloved leaders. NOT

2. Carlos Mesa: For years there has been a running debate about whether the bearded historian is really as smart as he says he is. And now we know, he IS. He opted to write books instead of actually running again.

3. Victor Hugo Cardenas: That whole "this is OUR Indian" thing may have worked in Sucre but it would never have played nationally.

4. Mayor Joaquino of Potosi: See above.

5. Samuel Doria Medina: Might actually have made a good president, if he could ever get more than 4% of the vote. Looks like he is gunning this time out to break that fateful 5% barrier. Betcha a Whopper with cheese he doesn't.

6. Goni: Hey, coming back and running again would have been a bold and gutsy move for the old fart in Maryland. But risky as well. There is that court case awaiting his presence in Sucre. But if he went to jail he could have debated Manfred's running mate without having to get in a car.

7. Any of the opposition governors still in office: Can you say notachanceinhell?

8. That Whacko Santa Cruz Guy Who Hijacked the Plane in Mexico this Week: Now this is one crazy ass Camba, which means he has a large natural base to build on among the tens of thouands of other crazy ass Cambas. A political plus. He is also an evangelical nutcase who thought God told him to hijack the plane, so that might draw some of the evangelical nutcase vote, also a big pocket. But even with those advantages he probably can't force Evo into a runoff.

And so…Manfred.

Hey the guy can finance his own campaign. He just uses that old formula by which donors calculate the return they can get from the graft he'll send their way. He looks good on TV. He actually seems to want the job. And of course, if things get bleak he can always go back to Miami.

Boy, this opposition to Evo really does have its act together. Just imagine how well they could govern.

Zorro!

9:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You forgot Hugo Banzer. The opposition loved him (though more so when he was a dictator). No wait, he is dead, isn't he? But maybe he can still get more votes than Manfred. Worth a try at least.

10:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry Bela...damn spanish

JD

4:57 PM  
Blogger Idearium said...

Right-wing ticket
http://bolivia.indymedia.org/node/44052

4:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

WHY BOMBIS REYES MISSED THE ULTIMATE DREAM-MATE & BEST SUITED CANDIDATE

And how could he have missed his uncle's move, sending his former boss back to the bolivian scene, with a better pedigree, so much more in common, and the probability of feigned or real amnesia, that make most undisputably LUIS ARCE "MALAVIDA" GOMEZ the prime choice, with every possible credential, imperium notwithstanding, corporate, federal, neo- con, & even faith-based match in heaven? P. Vilca Paz

3:25 PM  
Anonymous dsl router said...

The clashes were triggered after Villa allied with conservative opposition on issues surrounding the reform and rewriting of the Bolivian constitution and called for greater autonomy from the central government.

5:37 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excellent post. I'm from Bolivia and you tell it like it is. However, one important fact that you forgot to mention is that Manfred only joined the Sanchez de Lozada government after months of pleas and cajoling from the American Embassy. I remember him being very reluctant and even hostile to the idea of joining forces with his hated rival, but at the end he agreed just in time to see the ship sink. I am sure that he was convinced that it was the "patriotic" thing to do (and it probably came with $ome benefit$).

Another important fact that you omit is that he was the original proponent of the Constitutional Assembly and the reform of the hyper-corrupt political system, way before Evo took it as a political mantra. His initial popularity was based in equal parts on his successful run as a mayor and his political maverick status. It seems ironic that now he has become the last hope for the old political establishment that he helped to undermine.

Rodrigo

10:18 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Evo Morales is the fool-tool of the current New Hitler (Hugo Chavez), Evo dont know's nothing about history his knowledge is a transmission of fundamentalism ideology of Communism, his brain was full of doctrine of terrorism and guerrilla, his ideas doesn't links with human rights or something like that his goals are simply: destroy, hate, racism.

8:06 PM  
Blogger andrew said...

Nice going Manfred--align yourself with a person who is accused of helping/trying to kill many members of the majority--the indigenous of Bolivia.You will consolidate the vote of the few who share your views, while alienating all of the rest.

r4i

9:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Como se justifica que Bolivia, uno de los paises mas pobres de sudamerica, haga un credito a rusia por millones de dolares para comprar armas.
Ese dinero Evo lo esta tirando al agua, Deberia prestar dinero para utilizarlo en mas carreteras, mas hospitales, universidades
o en fabricas que darian empleos a los bolivianos.
y no en armas que solo terminaran matando a mas bolivianos.
Una de las cualidades de todos los seres humanos es que podemos pensar, preguntarnos y repondernos:
Queremos ser gobernados por un par de solteros que no entienden lo que es criar hijos? NO
Quremos que alguien administre el pais sin tener la preparacion y la experiencia ? NO
Queremos que nuestros hijos se vayan a otro pais porque no hay trabajo aqui? NO
Queremos perder nuestros derechos constitucionales y la libertad? NO
Queremos que la droga nos robe a nuetrso hijos? NO
Queremos que el estado/gobierno nos de permiso hasta para ir a la frontera? NO

La logica dice que no tiene sentido que un par de solterones sean los lideres de las familias bolivianas.
La logica dice que para poder entender algebra, primero hay que aprender a sumar.
La logica dice que para poder entender a los padres de familias que trabajan, primero hay que ser padre.
Por la tanto, para que un candidato postule para presidente o senador, primero debe haber hecho carrera
y calificar para ese trabajo de tan alta responsabilidad.
Si le damos el trabajo a una persona que no esta calificada, lo unico que nos queda es rezar.

Imagine que el pais es su empresa y ud esta buscando a un administrador
para que le administre sus recursos y que tambien vea por la salud
y el cuidado de sus hijos.
Daria el trabajo a una persona que no a tenido esposa y hijos que cuidar?
Daria el trabajo a alguien que nunca admisnitro una empresa?.
Si nos detenemos y pensamos... La respuesta es NO.

Este 6 de diciembre votemos por MANFRED o por SAMUEL, estos candidatos califican y tienen
la experiencia. http
Compatriotas, no siempre se tiene la oportunidad de ser parte de la historia
tenemos 20 dias para hacer campaña y salvar la democracia votando por MANFRED o por SAMUEL
Ayudemos al pais donde nacimos, conversando con una o dos personas. http://www.samuel.bo/
y enviando emails y al facebook para que este 6 de diciembre el Mas no se quede
con el poder total.
Se eligen a 3 senadores por departamento y una de las funciones de los senadores es fiscalizar al presidente.
Por ejemplo: En una democracia todo prestamo o compra al fio debe ser autorizada por el congreso (diputados y senadores). Si el congreso no lo autoriza y solo fue autorizada por el presidente
y su gabinete, se considera una deuda ilegal. (el 2009 la deuda externa del pais aumento en mas de 100 millones de dolares)
La corte de justicia debe EXISTIR para que el estado no se lo lleve preso sin la proteccion de un juez y
un juicio justo y inmediato en una corte donde se cometio el delito.

1:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How can Evo justify for Bolivia, one of the poorest countries of South America, to get a credit to Russia for millions of dollars to buy weapons.
That money Evo is pouring into water. Evo should borrow money to use for more roads, more hospitals, universities
or in factories that would employ the Bolivians.
and not to buy weapons that ended up killing more Bolivians.
One of the qualities of all human beings is that we can think, question and answering ourselves:
Do we want to be governed by a pair of singles who do not understand what is parenting? NO
Do we someone administering the country without the preparation and experience? NO
Do we want our children go to another country because there is no work here? NO
Do we want to lose our constitutional rights and freedom? NO
Do we want the drug to rob ours children? NO
Do we want the state / government to give us travel permit even to go to the border? NO

Common sense says that it makes no sense that a couple of bachelors are the leaders of the Bolivian families.
Common sense is that in order to understand algebra, you must first learn to add.
Common sense says that to understand working parents, you must first become a parent.
If we choose people that are not qualified to lead, the only thing left is to pray.

This December is better to vote for MANFRED or for SAMUEL, those candidates have the qualifications and the
experience to unite the bolivian people.Fellow bolivians, we not always have the opportunity to be part of history, we have 20 days to campaign and to save our democracy by voting for or MANFRED or SAMUEL
Help the country where you were born, talking to one or two people. http://www.samuel.bo/
and sending emails and facebook so this December 6 Evo do not get
total power.
3 senators are elected by department and one of the roles of senators is overseeing the president.
For example: In a democracy, any loan or purchase fio must be authorized by Congress (deputies and senators). If Congress does not authorize it and was only authorized by the president
and his cabinet, is considered an unlawful debt. (in 2009 the country's external debt increased over $ 100 million)
A court of justice must exist so the state can not take people to prison
without the protection of a judge and
a fair and immediate trial in a court where the crime was committed.

2:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home