Rationalizations for Bigotry: A Recent History


It isn’t that I think that all Americans of Japanese descent are bad people.  It is just that we are at war and can’t take any risk, so they and their children just have to be taken from their homes and put in camps until the war is over.


It is not that I am prejudiced against Negroes; it is just that it will be disruptive to the U.S. Armed Forces to force soldiers to integrate in their battle units with someone of another race.


It isn’t that I am prejudiced; I just believe that we ought to respect private property rights and if someone does not want to rent an apartment to someone because they are black or Latino, that’s their business.


It isn’t that I dislike black people; I just think they ought to stick to marrying their own kind.


It isn’t that I think homosexuals are bad people, it is just that letting them marry undermines the institution of marriage for everyone else.


It isn’t that I am against Muslim people; I just don’t think they ought to be able to build a community center two blocks from Ground Zero; it will hurt too many people’s feelings.

Browse all Blog From Bolivia posts. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Rationalizations for Bigotry: A Recent History

  1. Anonymous says:

    You forgot a couple, Jim.


    My effette elitism and white guilt numb my senses when the racist and oppressive country I was born in has always welcomed more immigrants than any other around the world and is a dream destination for millions of others.


    My liberal selective outrage calls those who oppose a mosque near Ground Zero bigots — damn the rest of the country’s feelings — while the burning of Qurans by a nutty “pastor” should be stopped because it might hurt the feelings of Muslims. (Of course I nary say a peep when Bibles are burned, Christians are persecuted and/or discriminated against, or crucifixes are drowned in jars full of urine in the name of “art”)

  2. Anonymous says:


    Is not that I don’t support free speech, but I really believe that the gov’t should be the final word as to what should be allowed to be in the mass media, specially when that particular gov’t has made race the central part of their speech, and more than any other party has engaged in hate speech.

  3. Anonymous says:

    It’s not that I am stupid, it is just that I enjoy leaving anonymous comments on this Blog pretending to be. Like the two above.

  4. Anonymous says:

    And in context of this blog, have the feelings of indigenous peoples even been taken into account?

  5. jdveneno says:

    the indigenous sold/traded their stake in manhattan years ago…i think for a pile of beads or something

  6. jdveneno says:

    some other smart-ass besides myself got the jump on me….

    There are already several mosques in lower manhattan


    as well as shinto temples near pearl harbor


    and a Nebraska Cornhusker store in Estes Park, Colorado Tracion!

  7. Anonymous says:

    And a U.S. Embassy in La Paz, which I think many Bolivians find offensive :)

    • Anonymous says:

      Most don’t. Did you see yesterday the line of people waiting to go inside stretch almost across the block?

  8. Anonymous says:

    well, Jim at least you are not blamming the Arabs for 9|11 anymore…